09 Nov 2007
1 min read

Corporate Officers Not Liable for Texas Franchise Tax -- Why Not?

In this case (Paccar Financial Corp. v. Potter, Texas Court of Appeals, Fifth District, No. 05-05-00403-CV, October 31, 2007), the individuals who had been corporate officers when a corporation's Texas franchise tax report was due had actually resigned before the corporate debt was incurred after the report was not filed. As a result they were […]
Blog
Table of contents

In this case (Paccar Financial Corp. v. Potter, Texas Court of Appeals, Fifth District, No. 05-05-00403-CV, October 31, 2007), the individuals who had been corporate officers when a corporation's Texas franchise tax report was due had actually resigned before the corporate debt was incurred after the report was not filed. As a result they were not personally liable for the corporation's debts.

That is somewhat of a surprising result, but good news for the officers. The states have been generally successful in attaching personal liability to corporate officers, but in this case, they were able to escape the pain. Good for them!

It's not necessarily a good thing to be a corporate officer these days. Lots of potential liabilities. As the old saying goes, "you can't know what you don't know".

Share this post
Copy link
Contact us
Stop worrying about sales tax
Let The Sales Tax People take care of it for you.
Blog Article Form
Latest posts
The Sales Tax Blog
Updates, tips, guides, industry best practices, and news.
View all posts
Join our newsletter
Be in the know: promotions, industry news & insights.
Newsletter Sign Up - "Subscribe"

We care about your data — privacy policy.